Today is George Steinbrenner's 75th birthday. I really don't care a bit about that, but it was a bit of trivia that I picked up from ESPN this morning. I actually can't stand the Yankees, or the Cowboys for that matter. Any team that is considered "America's Team" in any sport just conjures up images of bandwagon-jumping rednecks, like the rednecks that I went to school with until I switched to a much bigger nearby district for high school where my Dad taught for 30+ years. I'm not saying that it's "not OK" to like a team that you don't live near, because after all I am a 49ers fan (since before they won their first Super Bowl), and I've never even been to San Francisco. These kids were all living in upstate NY, and were Cowboys fans with no ties to Texas because it was the "cool team to like" for the in crowd. That is just lame. Oh, and by the way, how 'bout them Nats? They just swept the Cubs on the road. Impressive.
Sandra Day O'Connor is of course retiring. Get ready for the shitstorm. It has already begun. I am actually seeing a glimmer of hope here though. If Bush nominates Gonzales, it might not be all bad. Conservatives would prefer someone, well, more conservative. I don't think Gonzales is the best choice overall of course, but given the other options, he's probably the best choice. As for being the first Hispanic justice, that's good, but being an "advocate" for one minority group or another is not just shown by giving them positions of power. If W really wanted to make a statement about that group, he could quietly tighten up the borders while at the same time recognizing the contributions of those here, and keeping the same rights extended until they become naturalized. Conservatives would quickly lose interest in complaining about illegal immigrants getting benefits when they saw the dollars spent every year going down as people naturally integrate into our society. That would truly be "compassionate conservativism", but I think most people know that term is a ruse anyway.
My first week of work at the new job has been great! I have met lots of good people that are all very good at what they do as far as I can tell so far. There are certainly some systemic issues as with anywhere else, but the actual people that work there practically radiate competence, and that is a nice change. I understand that it's still the honeymoon period so to speak, and I'm just now getting beyond the surface of understanding, but I don't recall this same feeling after a week at my last job. Incompetence is easy to spot for me now. As for me, I'm just trying to keep up and make sure that I don't become the incompetent one! The bar has been raised.
Today I will be going to my friend Dan's house (Nicnerd on my blog), to have some beer and other Fourth of July food and festivities. Oh, and on Saturday we also got a new kitten from the Humane Society to keep our cat Snowball company. His name is Mojo. He's eleven weeks old, and he's quite a handful. Here is a picture, and don't let his rare picture of him at rest fool you. He's quite a juggernaut. The two kitties are getting acquainted slowly. We'll see how long the growling and hissing lasts from Snowball.
Monday, July 04, 2005
Born On The Fourth Of July
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
10 comments:
Here comes the shitstorm. Democrats have all of the sudden become SO'C fans. It was even written that she was a moderate conservative. Do you think that Souter is a moderate Liberal? Seriously, what the Hell do those terms mean?
I think that there should be no criteria other than who is best for the job. Pick a justice because of their race? It seems just a little illegal.
Pick a justice because they are strict Constitutionalist.
I like George Steinbrenner, I just don't root for the Yankees that much. And I have always been a Cowboys fan since the late 60's until all the drug crap in the 80's and early 90's.
Good thing that you are enjoying your job and I hope that the honeymoon continues.
Now, now - Erik beleives that the constituion is a "living, breathing, document". To hell with interpreting it as it is, it has only worked for what 200+ years, right? We need liberals so that we can make new laws as we go. Better to circumvent the balance of power with an all powerful judicial branch. When did the criteria for being appointed to the bench become the nominee's ability to overcome a fillibuster? To hell with with confirmation, get enough votes for cloture. We will get some middle of the road pansy, afraid to really interpret the law.
Sounds like making it up as you go along to me, but what do I know? I'm just a "bandwagon-jumping redneck" (albeit one who rooted for the Steelers and ABTY--Anybody But The Yankees).
Well nicnerd, if you can predict the issues that we will face 200+ years from NOW, I will call you Nostradamus. Hehheh. You have to be allowed some leeway.
Fatman, the part about the sports teams was largely tongue in cheek, though those certainly were my own personal experiences.
What's with the cat picture? If I see one more fucking cat picture on anyones blog I'm burning down the blogosphere!
Actually, I'm with Hector on that one.
mojo is so cute! i like the colour of his coat!
Umm yeah Devo, best adjust that tin foil hat of yours. We are moving to the left? Sheesh I did not get the memo again, people are always leaving me out.
Erik, you can ammend the constitution. They have this cool ammendment process just so that you can modify things as our needs change. See, back in the day women were not permitted to vote, so they made this ammendment (wonders how wise that was - LOL). Was that topic not discussed in your primary school civics lessons?
nicnerd, I couldn't find where women were denied the right to vote in the Constitution. I know that it just has to be there, but I can't find it. BTW, a comment on my site sent me to look at the Constitution today.
And Devo, I really don't think that Evangelicals are controlling anything. That was a MSM thing back during the election. Polling showed that the numbers stayed pretty much the same. Oh, and I'm Catholic and far, far, far to the right of W. I am a Conservative and he isn't.
Why shouldn't there be a strong christian presence in the government..It was founded "Under God"....The whole reason for this country wa sreligious freedom....the majority of americans are christians....Should they not get a voice....What the government should not do is discriminte against religion....all beliefs should be accepted and treated equally....After all governments are just a revision of religion...Once the powers that be figured out that just telling people that a "God" said to live your life like this or you will suffer in eternity was not working to control the people...Governments were started and we find ourselves in the steaming pile of crap we are today...
Post a Comment